Howdy Folks,
Once again, welcome back to another entry into my blog series revolving around Marc Aronson's "Race". In this third post, I will be discussing my personal opinion on the reading alongside analyzing how Aronson continued to develop his argument that race as a concept is something that has developed since the beginning of human society and has always been rooted in the minds of society as a result. This third section (pages 175 -206) is much shorter than any other section I have read yet, but is nonetheless still excellently written. Without further ado, let's dive in.
========================================================================

Once again, welcome back to another entry into my blog series revolving around Marc Aronson's "Race". In this third post, I will be discussing my personal opinion on the reading alongside analyzing how Aronson continued to develop his argument that race as a concept is something that has developed since the beginning of human society and has always been rooted in the minds of society as a result. This third section (pages 175 -206) is much shorter than any other section I have read yet, but is nonetheless still excellently written. Without further ado, let's dive in.
========================================================================

========================================================================
Before I really start off, I want to discuss my personal opinions on this section of reading. Once again, Aronson expertly weaves together his historical evidence and points with his own argument. It is crystal clear to the reader, which allowed me to quickly and effectively understand everything that went on in the chapter. The topic and content still somehow allowed the readers an opportunity to fully be given the extent to which a topic like "race" is really discussed and debated. Overall, Aronson's discussion of American racism post civil war alongside the topic of immigration being brought up further supported the idea that race is a construct that has been developed through history over time. The shortness of this section made it all the more enjoyable for me to read as I could get it done at a much more rapid pace.
========================================================================
To begin with, I wanted to start this blog off by mentioning the different rhetorical strategies that Mr. Marc Aronson utilized to develop his argument in this section of the reading. For starters, Aronson utilizes a pattern of short stories to begin chapters or sections depending on how he believes they can better explain his ideas and connect them to his argument. While he does this throughout most of the book, I picked up on it heavily again in this section due to certain points made by the author. For example, Aronson provides the reader with a short story/scenario discussing the value of music and if it is tarnished by tragedy and misuse. That story:
"Solomon writes the most unforgettable songs. His words are all about hatred, murder, death. His music is irresistible. AS they listen to the songs, many teenagers feel they are hearing a truth only they know. Solomon's fans hear his hard words and pulsing rhythms as the anthem for their generation. And then one loner, who has listened to that music -- just that music -- over and over again for days, comes into his school with a gun and starts shooting. His body and those of his victims appear night after night on the network news. Everyone knows precisely which songs the killer listened to. Are they still beautiful?" (Pages 182-183).
Hi Charlie, I liked your blog post. In my third blog post I also connected Aronson's argument on immigration in the past with our country's current attitude. I thought it was interesting the similarities between America today and America 100 years ago. While much as changed their are still major similarities in the way we treat immigrants. Was their anything you learned after reading this section?
ReplyDeleteHowdy Elizabeth,
DeleteThank you!!! I'm glad you enjoyed. It's also really cool to see someone else make the same connections I did. I definitely agree with you. I kinda learned a lot about what you said: there are still major similarities in the way we treat immigrants then and now and it is because of race as a concept.
Charlie, the discussion of the anecdotes Aronson uses to open the sections of the book is good. Do you think there is enough evidence to prove that immigration policy today is worse than immigration policy then?
ReplyDeleteMrs. LaClair,
DeleteThank you! I do think there is enough evidence through events in today and past events as to why current day immigration policies are just as bad as in the past. I'm not sure if we can 100% claim it is worse now, but I think the evidence presented by Aronson shows the severity of it in the past. That allows us to compare to modern day issues and really see the severity now.